ICOAMS2018 Paper Submission System

International Conference on Advanced Materials Science (ICOAMS2018)
24-25 October 2018

You have to login to submit ICOAMS2018 papers.
For the first time user, you need to create author account.
Selected reviewed-papers will be published by Scienific.Net in Material Science Forum indexed SCOPUS. Authors who submit to this conference agree to the Publication Ethics.


Template and Guidelines

Paper must be carefully formatted following the template.

ICOAMS2018 Paper Template

For manuscript preparation, authors must use the correct template.
Manuscript less than 6 pages should not be submitted. The maximum length of the manuscript is 7 pages.

International Conference on Advanced Materials Science
Conference Chairs:

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Waluyo Adi Siswanto, 
Dr.Tri Widodo Besar Riyadi


Dr. Abdul Latif Mohd Tobi,
Dr. Marwan Effendy

Track 1: Metallurgy and Materials Science

Track Director: Dr. Tri Widodo Besar Riyadi

• Ferrous and non-ferrous metallurgy • mineral processing • hydrometallurgy • pyrometallurgy • electrometallurgy • structure of materials • materials research and development.

Track 2: Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology

Track Director: Dr. Muhammad Syukron

• Nanoparticles • coatings and thin films • inorganic-organic hybrids and composites • membranes • nano-alloys • quantum dots • self-assemblies • graphene • nanotubes • synthesis of organic, inorganic, and hybrid nanomaterials • characterization of mesoscopic properties • modelling of nanomaterials and/or mesoscopic effects • new application of nanomaterials.

Track 3: Characterization and Testing of Materials

Track Director: Dr. Agus Dwi Anggono

• Destructive and non-destructive testings • mechanical and physical tests • metallography • failure analysis • corrosion resistance • chemical analysis • surface characterization and microanalysis of surfaces • features and fractures • industrial performance measurement • materials selection • general material design, characterization, and evaluation.

Track 4: Biomaterials, Energy materials and Advance Materials

Track Director: Dr. Joko Sedyono

• Physical, biological and chemical sciences that underpin the design of biomaterials • polymer synthesis and characterization • drug and gene vector design • the biology of the host response • immunology and toxicology and self assembly at the nanoscale • implantable devices •  bionanotechnology • tissue engineering • materials for energy (all aspects of thermal, renewable and nuclear power generation) • transmission and storage of the energy produced • development of materials with novel and/or useful optical, electrical, magnetic, catalytic, and mechanical properties.

Track 5: Computational Materials Science

Track Director: Dr. Supriyono

• obtaining new or enhanced insights into material behavior, properties and phenomena • predicting structure-property relationships for new materials in conjunction with data informatics • novel capabilities of computational tools, technical software and shareware, or cyberinfrastructures • application of modern computational methods alone or in conjunction with experimental techniques to investigate existing inorganic and organic materials as well as to discover new materials.

muhaimin's picture

Prof. Dr. Muhaimin Ismoen
Computational nanomaterials, Computational fluid dynamics, Numerical methods
Universiti Teknologi Brunei (UTB)
agusda's picture

Dr. Agus Dwi Anggono
Finite element analysis, Simulation, Design and Modeling, Manufacturing
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta (UMS)
jokosedyono's picture

Dr. Joko Sedyono
Composite Materials, Optimization, Manufacturing Process
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta (UMS)
kunharismah's picture

Dr. Kun Harismah
Organic chemistry, organic synthesis, natural products
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta (UMS)
marwan's picture

Dr. Marwan Effendy
Computational heat, Computational fluid dynamics
Universitaa Muhammadiyah Surakarta (UMS)

Muhammad Syukron, Ph.D
Materials science
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta (UMS)
ngafwan's picture

Mr. Ngafwan
Nano materials
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta (UMS)
sarjito's picture

Dr. Sarjito
Computational Heat, Computational fluid dynamics
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta (UMS)
supriyono's picture

Dr. Supriyono
Materials Engineering, Computational Solid Mechanics
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta (UMS)
triwidodo's picture

Dr. Tri Widodo Besar Riyadi
Materials Engineering
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta (UMS)
waluyo's picture

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Waluyo Adi Siswanto
Computational Mechanics, Finite Element Analysis, Biomechanics
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta (UMS)
otsuka's picture

Assoc. Prof. Dr Otsuka Yuichi
Biomaterials, Material science
Nagaoka University of Technology
abdlatif's picture

Dr. Abdul Latif Mohd Tobi
Finite Element Analysis,Computational Mechanics, Fatigue & Fracture
Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM)
dafit's picture

Dr. Dafit Feriyanto
Advanced materials, manufacturing
Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM)
sukri's picture

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mohammad Sukri Mustapa
Structural Integrity, Fatigue Failure, Fatigue Crack Growth, Fracture Mechanics, Fibre Composite
Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM)
zulafif's picture

Dr. Mohammad Zulafif Rahim
Materials Manufacturing, Advanced Machining, Machine Design
Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM)
negentrau's picture

Mr. Nagentrau Muniandy
Mechanics of material, Finite element method, Hardfacing
KDU University College

Ethical guidelines for journal publication


Publisher is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers

Article withdraw policy
It is a general principle of scholarly communication that the editor/guest editor of a learned journal/series is solely and independently responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal shall be published. In making this decision the editor/guest editor is guided by policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. An outcome of this principle is the importance of the scholarly archive as a permanent, historic record of the transactions of scholarship. Articles that have been published shall remain extant, exact and unaltered as far as is possible. However, very occasionally circumstances may arise where an article is published that must later be retracted or even removed. Such actions must not be undertaken lightly and can only occur under exceptional circumstances, such as:

Article Withdrawal:
Only used for Articles in Press which represent early versions of articles and sometimes contain errors, or may have been accidentally submitted twice. Occasionally, but less frequently, the articles may represent infringements of professional ethical codes, such as multiple submission, bogus claims of authorship, plagiarism, fraudulent use of data or the like.
Article Retraction:
Infringements of professional ethical codes, such as multiple submission, bogus claims of authorship, plagiarism, fraudulent use of data or the like. Occasionally a retraction will be used to correct errors in submission or publication.
Article Removal:
Legal limitations upon the publisher, copyright holder or author(s).
Article Replacement:
Identification of false or inaccurate data that, if acted upon, would pose a serious health risk.


Peer Review Process

All submitted full papers will be peer reviewed. The acceptance will be granted if the recommendations from the reviewers are positive. The criteria are based on the technical contents, clarity and format. Authors should make sure the submitted papers use the template for this conference. There are three review processes: Initial Review, Peer Review and Recommendation.

Initial Review

The track director evaluates each manuscript in the submission track to determine if its topic and content is suitable for consideration for the conference before being reviewed. Manuscripts that do not meet minimum criteria are returned to the authors. This is in the best interest of the authors who could then decide to either correct the problems or to submit the manuscript to a more appropriate venue, avoiding delays from a lengthy review process that would nonetheless lead to rejection.

Peer Review

Manuscripts that pass the initial review by the Track Directors, will be sent to several referees based on their expertise. Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two referees. The referees are asked to evaluate the manuscript based on its originality, soundness of methodology, impact to design research, and relevance to design practices. To facilitate timely publication, referees are asked to complete their reviews and provide individual critiques within two weeks. After collecting the referees' reports, the Track Director makes a recommendation on the acceptability of the manuscript.

Acceptance Decision

Based on the referees' comments, the Track Director makes a final decision on the acceptability of the manuscript and communicates to the authors the decision, along with referees' reports. The status reports to reviewers should identify the reviewers of each paper, the final decision can be "Accept Submission", "Revisions Required", or "Decline Submission." The revised version should be submitted considering the review comments.


The authors should make sure that the manuscript pass a criterion of maximum 30 percents similarities to other publications.